Once upon a time, the advice of our friends was more than enough for choosing the new video game we were going to play, but those days are far behind. In 2018 alone, 9,050 new games were released on the Steam platform. Moreover, this figure shows only desktop games. If you also include mobile games, the numbers increase quite a lot. For example, according to Play Store statistics, 6,408 applications were released every day in 2018. In short, we can no longer rely on the advice of our friends because nobody has that many friends. We need the opinions of professionals who do this as a job. And we need those opinions even if we are playing casino games. The modern people have limited time and need to get the most useful information as soon as possible, even if they are playing slot machines at £20 free no deposit casino.
Video games reviews are, therefore, important and have become an industry in itself. No matter what kind of games we like, we don’t start playing any without reading its review. In fact, sometimes we prefer not to start at all. If the reviewer is not happy with the release, our purchase decision may be affected. In other words, reviews have a real impact on the sales success of a game. But how right is it to rely on game reviews to guide us? Are we giving too much importance to reviewers? In short, should we still rely on video games reviews?
They Were Not Objective Even During the Good Old Days
We started reading reviews on the internet about 25 years ago. Starting with sites like GameSpot and IGN, this adventure started with an amateur spirit first, and the reviewers were old-school players with no political problems. In other words, people who already played these games shared their experiences with other people. They didn’t bother giving anyone a political message, they didn’t accept gifts from developers (because there was no such practice), and they obviously didn’t care much about what the readers thought. As a reviewer who worked in this period, I do not remember ever thinking about whether I would offend anyone or not.
The reviews of video games during this period were not objective at all. On the contrary, game reviews in the 90s and 2000s were incredibly subjective. There were personal opinions, favourite developers, and favourite series – you could see their impact in every review. For example, I can list many games that automatically get a score of “90” just because they were developed by an all-time favourite company.
However, we should also state that these subjective thoughts were extremely naïve compared to today. For example, it was possible to favour a company simply because we loved their previous games, but we never promoted a game just because it defends a certain political view. Likewise, no particular release got a high score just because there was a connection between the publisher and the review website. In this period, preparing game reviews was literally a “geek” experience: We were writing for ourselves and our circle of friends, and we didn’t care what others thought.
The Modern Era of Video Game Reviews
At some time during the late 2000s, preparing video game reviews became a job, like any other. The “guys in suits” conquered each and every platform – they were seriously connected too. Suddenly, our editors started asking us to pay special attention to certain games. If a newly released game has banner ads on a review website, for example, its score could not be lower than a certain figure. Otherwise, you get fired – that’s what happened to Jeff Gerstmann. The majority of the old guards, myself included, have left the industry after this accident.
A short while after, a political movement hit the video game reviews industry. Those who identify themselves as social justice warriors (SJW) took over the flag from the guys in suits and started to ask for different things. If a video game was defending certain political views and had some stereotype characters, it was automatically getting a high score. And this is still the case at the moment. If a game is good for the SJW community, it gets a big score; otherwise, it is labelled as “fascist, racist, misogynist” and thrown out. Sometimes it’s just easier to play simple online casino game at https://slotsfans.com/blog/20-free-no-deposit-bonus/ and don’t be bothered with all that stuff.
To summarize, video game reviews were never really useful – they were always subjective, and they are still subjective. Sure, the reasons behind this subjectivity are different, but this does not change the fact that you are not getting objective information. Our recommendation is simple: Either use forums to learn the opinions of other players (not reviewers) or watch a couple of YouTube videos to understand whether the set is good for you or not. But unless you share the same world view, stay away from video game reviews: Nowadays, they cannot help you at all.